BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Do you support reunification of divided Balochistan?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 20.11.2008

 Armed resistance is the only way': Baloch leaders

By Saleem Shahid Thursday, 20 Nov, 2008 QUETTA: Baloch leaders vowed to continue their struggle for self-determination saying that Pakistani assemblies cann...


 20.11.2008

 Multiple attacks by militants hit Balochistan

By Saleem Shahid Thursday, 20 Nov, 2008 | QUETTA: Unknown armed men attacked the Police Training College in Sariab area with rockets and bullets, while one p...


 19.11.2008

 Blast rocks Quetta railway station

Wednesday, 19 Nov, 2008   QUETTA: According to DawnNews, an explosion took place at the Quetta railway station on Wednesday evening.   A bomb...


 19.11.2008

 BNP against bigotry based on sex, race and religion

By Saleem Shahid Wednesday, 19 Nov, 2008 QUETTA: General Secretary of Balochistan National Party (Awami) woman wing Dr. Fauzia Marri has taken serious excep...


 19.11.2008

 India opposes IPI penalty proposal

* Iran wants amendment to GSPA force majeure clause, replacing ‘act of war’ with ‘situation of armed conflict or war’By Iftikhar GilaniNEW DELHI: India has oppo...


all news >>

OPINIONS    

Editorial: Balochistan simmers

22.08.2008

 


THE resignation of the Musharraf-appointed governor of Balochistan, Nawab Zulfikar Ali Magsi, should not be read as just another act in the clearing of the Musharraf stables. On Independence Day, the governor had given his first public indication of his intention to resign, citing the depressing law and order situation in Balochistan. Speaking to the media, the governor had all but admitted that the attempts by the civilian administration in Balochistan to pacify the province had failed. Aug 26 will be the second death anniversary of Nawab Akbar Bugti and any hope that the new political dispensation after the February elections would alleviate the grim situation in Balochistan has evaporated. The coalition at the centre had promised to focus on real reform in Balochistan but has predictably opted for cosmetic changes thus far. Earlier this week, Prime Minister Gilani released Rs6bn to help tide over a financial crunch in the province. Earlier some high profile political prisoners were released, including Sardar Akhtar Mengal, president of his faction of the Balochistan National Party, and Shahzain Bugti, grandson of the late Nawab Akbar Bugti. Yet the fundamental grievances of the province — its legal relationship with the centre; control of its mineral wealth; and its share in the development projects — that sparked the violence in the province in the first place remain unaddressed.

The most immediate demand of the Baloch nationalists though is to end the military ‘operation’ in the province that they claim is being carried out. The government, however, denies that there is an on-going operation, claiming its actions are only in self-defence. To an extent, it is possible to understand the government’s predicament. As Baloch militants continue to blow up gas pipelines, railway tracks and electricity pylons, kidnap government officials, launch rockets at government installations, and attack settlers from Punjab it is difficult for the state to simply do nothing. The most radical militants in Balochistan are also not looking for a negotiated settlement. Thus Bramdagh Bugti guerrilla leader has gone on record rejecting provincial autonomy and demanding ‘complete independence’ of the Baloch land. Yet what the centre cannot afford to do is to continue to ignore the province’s political grievances. The resolution moved in the Balochistan assembly against Gen (Retd) Musharraf was unanimously supported by the house, demonstrating that the ruling coalition at the centre has the support of the province when it wants to get things done. In 2005, a subcommittee of the National Assembly had done extensive work on Balochistan after holding negotiations with various segments of society. Regrettably, the recommendations that were drawn up in a report prepared after this exercise were not implemented. Hence the com-plaint of Balochistan’s politicians and people that the centre simply does not work hard enough or fast enough to address their demands appears to be valid.
Until that changes, the violence will continue.

http://www.dawn.com/2008/08/22/ed.htm

« Previous  |  Next »

• 21.08.2008 - The Story of Safdar Sarki
• 21.08.2008 - Crossing the rubicon
• 19.08.2008 - Aga Khan Help on Baluchistan sought
• 19.08.2008 - Musharraf's Resignation Recalls His Staged Appearance At UN, Impunity Questions Loom
• 16.08.2008 - Pakistan army, I.S.I. put on mat over Baluchistan, Afghanistan

All opinions

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 30.09 - Requiem for Reko Diq
 13.06 - Will history absolve them?
 13.05 - Testing times
 08.04 - Essentially bogus
 24.03 - Is a rollback possible?

 - Senator Sanaullah Baloch

 02.11 - Balochistan: myth of development
 22.09 - The case against Musharraf
 05.08 - A lesson to be learnt
 16.05 - Balochistan peace prospects
 15.05 - The Baloch-Islamabad conflict

 - Aziz Baloch

 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Women’s Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: It’s Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis
 07.07 - Balochistan: Invisible to the International Community?

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright ©2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP