BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Do you support reunification of divided Balochistan?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 20.11.2008

 Armed resistance is the only way': Baloch leaders

By Saleem Shahid Thursday, 20 Nov, 2008 QUETTA: Baloch leaders vowed to continue their struggle for self-determination saying that Pakistani assemblies cann...


 20.11.2008

 Multiple attacks by militants hit Balochistan

By Saleem Shahid Thursday, 20 Nov, 2008 | QUETTA: Unknown armed men attacked the Police Training College in Sariab area with rockets and bullets, while one p...


 19.11.2008

 Blast rocks Quetta railway station

Wednesday, 19 Nov, 2008   QUETTA: According to DawnNews, an explosion took place at the Quetta railway station on Wednesday evening.   A bomb...


 19.11.2008

 BNP against bigotry based on sex, race and religion

By Saleem Shahid Wednesday, 19 Nov, 2008 QUETTA: General Secretary of Balochistan National Party (Awami) woman wing Dr. Fauzia Marri has taken serious excep...


 19.11.2008

 India opposes IPI penalty proposal

* Iran wants amendment to GSPA force majeure clause, replacing ‘act of war’ with ‘situation of armed conflict or war’By Iftikhar GilaniNEW DELHI: India has oppo...


all news >>

OPINIONS    

Balochistan: Continuing militancy

01.06.2008

 

THE Baloch Liberation Army has claimed responsibility for yet another attack in Quetta, the third in three days. The first two attacks were carried out on Wednesday in which four people, including a security man, succumbed to targeted firing. In the latest incident on Friday, six cricket-playing youngsters from the Hazara community were gunned down by assailants on motorbikes. While the BLA has kept up armed attacks in Balochistan, despite the new government’s promises of ‘reconciliation’ and socio-economic development for the province, what has complicated matters is the hard stance of nationalist parties. On Friday, Bramdagh Bugti of the newly formed Baloch Republican Party voiced his support for the militants, saying that the Baloch were masters of their own resources and there was ‘no need’ to talk to others on the subject. This attitude is dangerous, especially in a situation where the government, conscious of Balochistan’s past ill-treatment, appears eager to make amends. Perhaps the most visible manifestation of this is its call for an all-parties conference, the release of Akhtar Mengal and Shahzain Bugti and the promise to abolish the Concurrent List, a move that would lead to greater provincial autonomy. Unfortunately, the delay in taking more concrete action is giving rise to scepticism about the government’s good intentions. For the Baloch, the military still dominates the provincial landscape and the government has yet to prove that it is in charge, and not the army.

All this foot-dragging has to stop if headway is to be made in allaying Baloch suspicions. For starters, the government should immediately take up the offer of Akhtar Mengal — whose credentials as a Baloch leader have been enhanced by several months of detention under inhumane conditions — for peace talks. Clearly, there is a need for moderate Baloch leaders to convince hardened nationalist groups to soften their tone so that a genuine breakthrough can be made.

However, again, the intervention of such leaders can only prove meaningful if the government shows more resolve in making good on its promise of addressing Balochistan’s woes and getting rid of the army’s malevolent presence. At this point feelings of alienation run high among the general population that has waited for decades for a solution to its poverty, underdevelopment and lack of control over its resources. In addition, the people have suffered grave human rights abuses, and hundreds of Baloch are said to be in the custody of intelligence agencies. Under these circumstances, and unless it acts soon to reverse the situation, the government would find it a challenge to hold the federation together.

http://www.dawn.com/2008/06/01/ed.htm

« Previous  |  Next »

• 30.05.2008 - Balochistan situation
• 27.05.2008 - Why will Islamabad not give us ownership of our land, coast, resources?’
• 17.05.2008 - Balochistan Assembly demands CPA membership
• 16.05.2008 - A Seething Fury
• 14.05.2008 - Gwadar Port concession questioned

All opinions

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 30.09 - Requiem for Reko Diq
 13.06 - Will history absolve them?
 13.05 - Testing times
 08.04 - Essentially bogus
 24.03 - Is a rollback possible?

 - Senator Sanaullah Baloch

 02.11 - Balochistan: myth of development
 22.09 - The case against Musharraf
 05.08 - A lesson to be learnt
 16.05 - Balochistan peace prospects
 15.05 - The Baloch-Islamabad conflict

 - Aziz Baloch

 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Women’s Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: It’s Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis
 07.07 - Balochistan: Invisible to the International Community?

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright ©2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP