BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Do you support reunification of divided Balochistan?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 08.01.2009

 Balochistan: 2 gas pipelines blown up in Sui

QUETTA: Unidentified armed men blew up two gas pipelines in Sui in Tehsil bazaar on Wednesday. The unidentified militants had planted explosives near the gas pi...


 07.01.2009

 Appeal to President by ‘a daughter of Balochistan’

  MR President, you may recall the letter in these columns (Sept 12, 2008) wherein I had earnestly asked for your help in getting restored my services wit...


 07.01.2009

 No compromise on Baloch rights: BRP, Ittehad Marri

Amanullah Kasi Tuesday, 06 Jan, 2009   QUETTA: Anjuman Ittehad Marri and Baloch Republican Party have announced that no compromise would be made on ...


 05.01.2009

 Three Baloch groups formally end ceasefire

  QUETTA: Three armed groups in Balochistan on Sunday announced the formal end of a four-month-old unilateral ceasefire in response to the security forces...


 05.01.2009

 Three injured in Dera train attack

* Balochistan Constabulary man killed By Malik Siraj Akbar QUETTA: Unidentified assailants targeted a train going from Balochistan to Sindh on Sunday as armed m...


all news >>

OPINIONS    

An Editorial: The money angle

07.02.2005

A report in the press has indicated that the Balochistan government, these days the focus of much attention because of its failure to control the unrest there, has also got money problems. These might be portrayed as being due to inefficient and corrupt provincial machinery, but the facts indicate first that the Balochistan government is not alone; its problems are common to all the provinces.

They are rooted in the Centerâ?Ts dismissive attitude towards the provincesâ?T finances, reflected in the failure since 2002 to finalise a National Finance Commission Award. To be fair, this government is not particularly mean to the provinces; the caretaker Meraj Khalid government finalised an Award in 1997 which was based on tax revenue projections which were clearly far-fetched, and which the provinces had initially objected to strenuously.

As a result, the present Award, which the Nawaz government did nothing to improve in its tenure even though it could have, is based on flawed projections, and is three years past its sell-by date. The harmful effects are being felt by the provinces, and the Centerâ?Ts finances benefit.

The trap, into which the provinces have fallen, is that the initial projections were overestimated, with the result that the provinces receive lower annual budget estimates from the Centre every year than they had expected. Then, until a couple of years ago, CBR used to fail to meet the budget projections, and the provinces thereby got not just less money than they had a right to expect under the Awardâ?Ts projections, but less money than they were promised in the beginning of the year.

Some provincial Finance Ministers, particularly those of Sindh, have tried to portray this as some kind of stealing by the Centre, but that does not solve their fiscal problem while weakening the federation. The provinces can do nothing about this, because they draw at least 80 percent (the Punjab), and as much as 95 percent (Balochistan) of their revenue from the federal sources under the NFC Award.

They therefore have no control over tax collection, and cannot improve their own revenue position. Even though the money is their right under the Constitution, the Centre still behaves as if this is a dole it gives out of its generosity.

An NFC Award, which meets the provinceâ?Ts requirements and is based on realistic projections, is the need of the hour. Balochistanâ?Ts problems, or those of other provinces, are not going to be solved by the Centre launching mega projects (which it controls), but by empowering the provincial governments and giving them due resources, which would allow them to meet the needs of their populaces. Giving them more control over their resource bases, such as devolving buoyant taxes to them, would also help.

If such a strategy had been adopted, of obeying the Constitution in its true letter and spirit, rather than continuously trying to subvert it by narrow and even patently incorrect interpretations, it is possible that Baloch leaders might not have been making the sort of unrealistic demands, like ownership of natural resources vesting in the freeholder, which are now proving a stumbling block in an agreement. 

http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/feb-2005/7/editorials1.php

« Previous  |  Next »

• 06.02.2005 - Are neighbours adding fuel to Pakistanâ?Ts Balochistan fire?
• 06.02.2005 - Unrest in Balochistan
• 06.02.2005 - Why open so many fronts?
• 06.02.2005 - Balochistan
• 05.02.2005 - An editorial: A deepening crisis

All opinions

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 30.09 - Requiem for Reko Diq
 13.06 - Will history absolve them?
 13.05 - Testing times
 08.04 - Essentially bogus
 24.03 - Is a rollback possible?

 - Senator Sanaullah Baloch

 02.11 - Balochistan: myth of development
 22.09 - The case against Musharraf
 05.08 - A lesson to be learnt
 16.05 - Balochistan peace prospects
 15.05 - The Baloch-Islamabad conflict

 - Aziz Baloch

 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Women’s Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: It’s Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis
 07.07 - Balochistan: Invisible to the International Community?

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright ©2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP