BALOCHUNITY.ORG    BALOCHUNITY.ORG

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    SEARCH 


    QUESTIONER'S 

Do you support reunification of divided Balochistan?




Vote   Results

    NEWS & OTHER LANG. NEWS

 08.01.2009

 Balochistan: 2 gas pipelines blown up in Sui

QUETTA: Unidentified armed men blew up two gas pipelines in Sui in Tehsil bazaar on Wednesday. The unidentified militants had planted explosives near the gas pi...


 07.01.2009

 Appeal to President by ‘a daughter of Balochistan’

  MR President, you may recall the letter in these columns (Sept 12, 2008) wherein I had earnestly asked for your help in getting restored my services wit...


 07.01.2009

 No compromise on Baloch rights: BRP, Ittehad Marri

Amanullah Kasi Tuesday, 06 Jan, 2009   QUETTA: Anjuman Ittehad Marri and Baloch Republican Party have announced that no compromise would be made on ...


 05.01.2009

 Three Baloch groups formally end ceasefire

  QUETTA: Three armed groups in Balochistan on Sunday announced the formal end of a four-month-old unilateral ceasefire in response to the security forces...


 05.01.2009

 Three injured in Dera train attack

* Balochistan Constabulary man killed By Malik Siraj Akbar QUETTA: Unidentified assailants targeted a train going from Balochistan to Sindh on Sunday as armed m...


all news >>

OPINIONS    

The package, at last

25.06.2005


ONE of the two Parliamentary subcommittees on Balochistan which was due to present its recommendations in three months has finally released them after seven months. The other, assigned to recommend constitutional changes to broaden provincial autonomy, is still pondering them.

 

The good thing about the exercise is that an attempt has been made to tackle the long standing complaints of Balochistan. The proposals have however to be discussed in Parliament and implemented by the government, so hurdles cannot be ruled out. The inordinate delay in readying the proposals and dark hints thrown by Ch Shujaat Hussain that the committee faced opposition from certain circles strengthen the perception that the implementation may not be smooth. 

The only concrete thing that emerges from the recommendations is a Rs 10 billion package. The rest are promises and suggestions that seem fine on paper, but only time will tell if they are fully implemented. The development package has been neatly divided among particular projects like provision of lifesaving drugs and anti-venom vaccines for hospitals and development of Sui, Gwadar and Quetta.

 

Whether those for whom the package is meant agree with the committee’s priorities remains to be seen. It has been assured that the 5.4 percent quota in federal government jobs will be implemented, a promise which would be widely welcomed.

 

However the quota has always existed in one for or another, with the present percentage determined in 1998, but it has never been implemented honestly due to the machinations of a vested interest, that have ranged from issuing fake domicile certificates and keeping vacancies secret and appointing outsiders on jobs on the plea that no local candidate was available.

 

All this, despite solemn promises by successive regimes, would make many Baloch keep their fingers crossed. The promise to spend gas and petroleum royalty on areas from where they are extracted is fine. So is providing the people of Balochistan representation on the Boards of Directors of OGDC and Sui Southern, and restricting the jurisdiction of the Coastguards and the FC to border areas.

 

A three-member committee has been appointed to get these recommendations implemented. But most recommendations, particularly those about development funds, ultimately have to implemented by the provincial administration. The way the Jam government is already divided on the issue of sharing development funds and perks and privileges provides little confidence about how the financial package will be implemented. 

The Baloch opposition’s boycott of committee proceedings along with the PPP indicates they are not willing to own the package. They have challenged the committee’s competence, accused it of ignoring the basic issue of autonomy and called the recommendations cosmetic.

 

Keeping in view the statements issued by important Baloch leaders, they may describe what has been offered as too little, too late. Ch Shujaat had promised a reform package beyond the dreams of the people of Balochistan. It remains to be seen if what has been announced comes up to the expectations roused by this promise. 

 

http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/june-2005/25/editorials1.php

« Previous  |  Next »

• 21.06.2005 - EDITORIAL: The Gwadar tangle
• 18.06.2005 - Crouching Tiger, Swimming Dragon
• 12.06.2005 - Jamali blasts govt on privatisation, NFC, imports
• 10.06.2005 - Gwadar: bright prospects
• 08.06.2005 - Did the ISI lay a trap for Advani?

All opinions

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    MAP 

  BALOCHUNITY.ORG

    COLUMNISTS 

 - Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

 30.09 - Requiem for Reko Diq
 13.06 - Will history absolve them?
 13.05 - Testing times
 08.04 - Essentially bogus
 24.03 - Is a rollback possible?

 - Senator Sanaullah Baloch

 02.11 - Balochistan: myth of development
 22.09 - The case against Musharraf
 05.08 - A lesson to be learnt
 16.05 - Balochistan peace prospects
 15.05 - The Baloch-Islamabad conflict

 - Aziz Baloch

 13.11 - A Voice of a Baloch
 27.09 - Two Women’s Tragedies in Balochistan: Honor Killing and Rape.
 25.08 - Self-determination of Balochistan: Looking Back and Looking Forward
 11.08 - United Nations: It’s Contribution to the Everlasting Balochistan Crisis
 07.07 - Balochistan: Invisible to the International Community?

 Malik Siraj Akbar

all columnists >>

Copyright ©2007 BalochUnity.org. All rights reserved.  

Free Web Hit Counter
Online Casino

mail@balochunity.org

  front page

 | ABOUT US | NEWS | FACTS | OPINIONSLETTERS | HISTORY | ECONOMY | LINKS | GUESTBOOK | FORUM 

CONTACT & SITE MAP